Even a short article you might be able to find glimpse that indicate expertise” and you might be able to say:
How many articles would that be? To know this about someone else I must keep learning about myself and my real motivations in interaction with another in a situation. Your comments; On the other hand, if someone is an authority, he doesn’t have this problem because his knowledge is always increasing as he is always learning more, searching and studying all the time!”
On the other hand, if someone is an authority, he doesn’t have this problem because his knowledge is always increasing as he is always learning more, searching and studying all the time! I think I might have a few articles in the depression” category, as I have had some fellow athletes, employees and franchisees in the past with such issues and it has piqued my curiosity. I think each expert writer must have knowledge enough to give and to sell, without keeping his/her best ideas for when he/her gets paid.
If you put out information for free here (articles or posts) are you saying such information is lesser than your true abilities, if so I agree. Wouldn’t you personally like a BS-Filter” as an Internet User and reader? You asked: Do we agree on the goals of the project to find: ‚¬an efficient method of determining if an online posted article was written by an expert or authority‚¬
I think he missed the point that if he wants new ideas he will have to let some of his best article writers express themselves as they have developed their own art of expression, and not as he wants. An efficient method of determining if an online posted article was written by an expert or authority” Reality is yours for the asking, but if you insist on projecting your own content into what is directly there, how then can you be effective and purposeful in this life?
Your remark: It really is unwise to attack people’s intelligence or fellow authors or bloggers, I just cannot go there, don’t care too.” We have teens with Blogs, we have people surfing for porn, we have people putting up pictures of their pets, we have people reading the news, we have people promoting politics, selling trinkets, ego surfing and serious people learning, doing research and such. They are humans, what did you expect and how much is really good intelligence on the Internet these days anyway?
It really is unwise to attack people’s intelligence or fellow authors or bloggers, I just cannot go there, don’t care too. Strephon states: I’m not sure that there are that many people who have the trained intelligence to actually organize anything on a comprehensive scale, including most people commenting in this blog.” If some of the smartest people in the world can use computer systems to find terrorists, certainly we can locate and identify the experts.
I’m not sure that there are that many people who have the trained intelligence to actually organize anything on a comprehensive scale, including most people commenting in this blog. The Carnegie Mellon crowd already uses there little AI programs to go onto forums and have conversations and can fool most people for a short time period, some people for longer. Computer generated articles, we can catch now, but someday that will be much harder.
I totally concur that this is not necessarily a quick fix and like the Gender Software” system that Chris Knight found, it is not full proof, sometimes it gets it wrong. Thus if we could design a program to Catch Mood” and have sub-type designation, similar to the Voice Recognition software which catches voice inflection” or emotion, no matter what dialect, I think we might have a very good search tool for the reader. Kip in item 97” not only would you be an expert, you would be the Expert, even if you never wrote an article.
But in determining if someone is an expert in the field they wrote a given article then we have to match the actual article against that niche right? Nevertheless if a human can read an article and feel that the writer is an authority then surely we can design a computer program to do the same thing. It turns out that most humans can tell when someone is an actual expert and not just an authority on the subject, but that takes a little more time than to say that they are or are not knowledgeable in a subject matter.
If we are to build an artificial intelligent computer program to recognize experts by the words that they write there are a few things we must do. First, we must consider how a human being comes to the conclusion if someone is an expert and determine if we can apply these same procedures. If you were a faker or poser it would not matter, maybe a good thing in fact because it would be easier for them to spot the fakes or poser articles. After five separate groups of two did this – that would be ten people reviewing each article.
Teams of two would read an article and then they would have to say poser or expert. Obviously, you could read all the 10 Billion Pages on the Internet right and that would take millions of lifetimes.